1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,200 2 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:07,980 In April 2026, 44 scientists of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) made a publication in 3 00:00:07,980 --> 00:00:15,801 which the previous scenario, the so-called SSP5-8.5, was classified as unlikely and not realistic. 4 00:00:15,801 --> 00:00:23,548 This scenario assumes completely unrealistic preconditions and predicts CO₂ emissions that would lead to a 5 00:00:23,548 --> 00:00:30,875 global temperature increase between 3-5 degrees Celsius if no drastic measures are taken. 6 00:00:30,875 --> 00:00:38,857 The German politician, chemist, book author and manager Fritz Vahrenholt calls this scenario "absurd from the outset". 7 00:00:38,857 --> 00:00:45,173 Thus, a counter-report was submitted to the IPCC in early 2025, which received approval in 8 00:00:45,173 --> 00:00:49,050 April 2026 after more than a year of review. 9 00:00:49,050 --> 00:00:58,053 The new scenario predicts a temperature increase in the year 2100 of only 2.56 degrees. 10 00:00:58,053 --> 00:01:05,180 Temperature increases are always referenced to the year 1860, i.e., the time BEFORE industrialization. 11 00:01:05,180 --> 00:01:11,424 Today we have an average temperature increase of about 1.5 degrees compared to then. 12 00:01:11,424 --> 00:01:18,486 According to this scenario, then, in the next 100 years there would be just about one degree on top. 13 00:01:18,486 --> 00:01:23,840 The climate warming caused by man-made CO₂ is not uncontroversial. 14 00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:29,632 Other theories assume above all that the Earth is warming due to increased solar activity. 15 00:01:29,632 --> 00:01:36,534 But regardless of whether man-made CO₂ or solar activity, a further increase in global temperatures by 16 00:01:36,534 --> 00:01:44,378 1° Celsius in the next 100 years is generally regarded as "non-critical" and "manageable". 17 00:01:44,378 --> 00:01:49,482 Vahrenholt believes that now everyone can see that nature and humans can adapt to this in this 18 00:01:49,482 --> 00:01:53,189 case and that the "catastrophe has been called off". 19 00:01:53,189 --> 00:02:00,688 He doesn't mince words and says that the climate scientists who are currently being listened to are a "closed group that 20 00:02:00,688 --> 00:02:04,575 has allowed itself to be corrupted for the sake of grant money." 21 00:02:04,575 --> 00:02:10,935 Anyone who contradicted the climate narrative was taken out of the game and put in the penalty box. 22 00:02:10,935 --> 00:02:14,044 That is exactly what happened to Vahrenholt himself. 23 00:02:14,044 --> 00:02:21,794 As far as Germany is concerned: it produces just 1.5% of global CO₂ emissions. 24 00:02:21,794 --> 00:02:30,255 Regardless, many implemented and proposed prohibitions and mandates in Germany are still being pursued. 25 00:02:30,255 --> 00:02:35,048 In sum, within the European framework this leads to the continued dismantling not only of 26 00:02:35,048 --> 00:02:37,977 the German but of the entire economy in Europe. 27 00:02:37,977 --> 00:02:43,308 Vahrenholt demands: no further shutdowns of coal-fired power plants, no bans on combustion 28 00:02:43,308 --> 00:02:47,084 engines, away with the heating law and the CO₂ taxes. 29 00:02:47,084 --> 00:02:55,616 The German Federal Constitutional Court based its ruling that all emissions in Germany should go down to ZERO on precisely 30 00:02:55,616 --> 00:02:59,940 the 8.5 scenario, which has now been refuted as untenable: 31 00:02:59,940 --> 00:03:04,408 No dissenting voices were heard, no alternative scenarios were considered. 32 00:03:04,408 --> 00:03:06,665 Here too, improvements must be made. 33 00:03:06,665 --> 00:03:15,365 What is demanded is a public debate that reassesses the current facts and ends the destruction of the economy. 34 00:03:15,365 --> 00:03:23,722 The emeritus professor of experimental physics Dr. Gert Ganteför says it bluntly in an interview with Nius: 35 00:03:23,722 --> 00:03:28,673 The CO₂ problem was kidnapped by ideologues in scenario 8.5: 36 00:03:28,673 --> 00:03:35,045 The goal is to fundamentally change society – away from today's social market economy 37 00:03:35,045 --> 00:03:39,483 toward an eco-socialism and a "planned economy." 38 00:03:39,483 --> 00:03:46,093 These ideologues would have prescribed it like a religion in this manner: "We have calculated the forecast 39 00:03:46,093 --> 00:03:53,126 scientifically; if you do not live as we prescribe, then it will end badly, for you will burn up!" 40 00:03:53,126 --> 00:04:00,413 Those who used doomsday forecasts wanted to gain power and also enrich themselves in the process. 41 00:04:00,413 --> 00:04:05,176 But what does it look like in public discussion? – Here there is dead silence. 42 00:04:05,176 --> 00:04:14,096 Media used the climate topic for many years to spread fear and panic – now there is silence. 43 00:04:14,096 --> 00:04:19,820 This shows that the true masterminds of climate panic have not yet taken their goal out of their sights. 44 00:04:19,820 --> 00:04:28,443 Fear of climate escalation is spread like a mantra, and the climate goals are programmed into the population's subconscious. 45 00:04:28,443 --> 00:04:38,656 The 8.5 climate scenario belongs on the test bench – in politics as well as in schools, universities, and public debate. 46 00:04:38,656 --> 00:04:45,525 Now the sincere climate scientists are called upon to openly discuss the new findings. 47 00:04:45,525 --> 00:04:52,663 Politics and the judiciary must address this and examine what consequences arise from it for their decisions. 48 00:04:52,663 --> 00:04:59,609 And those who enriched themselves in this ruinous business must be held accountable! 49 00:04:59,609 --> 00:05:07,106 Billions in profits unlawfully obtained must be reclaimed and returned to the deceived people. 50 00:05:07,106 --> 00:05:11,998 You can find the two interviews with Fritz Vahrenholt and Dr. Gert Ganteför at the 51 00:05:11,998 --> 00:05:14,862 links in the blue info box below the broadcast.